Summary: This article traces the size and shape of those snakes, by investigating the energy security implications of Medupi and particularly both sides of the “Medupi controversy.” The plant is the state-owned utility Eskom’s largest single investment in its 84-year history, and its construction currently involves more than 8,000 workers. Once completed, it will generate 10 percent of South Africa’s electricity. Yet it would also add 30 million tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere each year, emissions greater in volume than those of 114 countries combined. Moreover, Medupi is so expensive that its completion has depended on international financing from multilateral development banks, including a $3.05 billion loan from the World Bank, its first to South Africa since the end of apartheid 16 years ago.
To better understand the energy security costs and benefits of a project like Medupi, this study begins by articulating four dimensions to energy security: availability, affordability, development and efficiency, and social and environmental stewardship. Based on a rigorous sampling of project documents, reports, testimonies, and articles, the article then iterates the energy security contributions and drawbacks to Medupi, concluding that it is an exemplary case of the conflict between different aspects of energy security. The importance of such an investigation is threefold.
First, and most narrowly, exploring the energy security consequences of Medupi offers insight into how energy policy and planning occur in South Africa. Second, the tensions involved with Medupi demonstrate the difficulty of expanding access to energy services while also mitigating degradation of the climate and natural environment. Third, and most generally, focusing on energy security as a multidimensional concept helps to move away from narrow depictions of security as fuel supplies or appropriately priced energy services. Our study recognizes the salience of these concerns and additionally situates them alongside often neglected dimensions of equity, environmental quality, social stewardship, and energy efficiency.
Full Citation: Sovacool, B.K. and Rafey, W. (2011). Snakes in the Grass: The Energy Security Implications of Medupi, The Electricity Journal, 24 (1): 92-100 (Available for download with subscription from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VSS-51XFXRB-2&_user=635696&_coverDate=02%2F28%2F2011&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1735000264&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000033878&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=635696&md5=ad3f3c73b40f6c5f23289361ebc9bd10&searchtype=a)
Filed under: Climate Change, Energy | Leave a Comment »