Comments for UCT Centre of Criminology

Comment on New Article: ‘Economics of Climate Change Adaptation at the Local Scale under Conditions of Uncertainty and Resource Constraints: the Case of Durban, South Africa’ by cliffordshearing

cliffordshearing — Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:57:11 +0000

ditto

Comment on New Article: ‘Ecosystem services management: an integrated approach’ by Jessie

Jessie — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:38:15 +0000

“New Article: �Ecosystem services management: an integrated approach� | UCT Centre of Criminology” was in fact really
engaging and enlightening! In todays society honestly, that
is very hard to carry out. Many thanks, Wallace

Comment on New Article: ‘Local people’s accounts of climate change: to what extent are they influenced by the media?’ by arkadaslik

arkadaslik — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:52:26 +0000

Excellent post,Thanks for your guide.
The information given in the quality article is dead on awesome. After hours of searching, this information was right on the mark and very interesting.

Comment on Green Economy Summit in South Africa by lowes deck designer

lowes deck designer — Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:55:52 +0000

With havin so much written content do you ever run into any issues
of plagorism or copyright violation? My website has a lot of
completely unique content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any methods to help protect against content from being stolen? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

Comment on ‘IFC invests €150m in post-2012 carbon credits fund’ by Winston Seltz

Winston Seltz — Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:23:37 +0000

What a lovely blog page. I’ll certainly be back again. Please hold writing!

Comment on New Article – ‘Applying a conservation-criminology framework to common-pool natural-resource issues’ by Jason

Jason — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:51:19 +0000

This sounds like an interesting article; I haven’t read much in this area of criminology. I’ll have to see if my university’s library subscribes to this journal bc/ I can’t access the Taylor and Francis full text!

Comment on ‘Cities and Climate Change: Responding to an Urgent Agenda’ by Tarig Anter

Tarig Anter — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:40:20 +0000

In managing the economy in any country, people and their government have to choose between four distinctly different available paths. Let us define them clearly and in simple terms:

Model A:
Maximize production & export; while maximizing consumption & imports. The results are: fast development; environmental degradation; materialistic corporatism.

Model B:
Maximize production & export; while minimizing consumption & imports. The results are: wealth accumulation; social disparities; and international hostility.

Model C:
Low production & export; while maximizing consumption & imports. The results are: sovereign debts; loss of independence; dysfunctional state.

Model D:
Low production & export; while minimizing consumption & imports. The results are: slow development; low qualities; weak defenses.

Only these models are demonstrated in all countries and the citizens can plainly know which way their country is going to, and argue with their governments the wisdom of their path.

So now what do people want? Do they want to be crazy; greedy; irresponsible; or vulnerable?
If people look deep inside their souls the answer will be definitely obvious.

Comment on ‘Climate change negotiators see no major Durban deal’ by klem

klem — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:14:31 +0000

Durban will be a worse failure than even Cancun was. I’ll bet even Al Gore does not attend this meeting.

Besides, who cares if a couple of climate negotiators shake hands and make some kind of climate agreement, if the folks at home aren’t on board its nothing more than a photo-op.

cheers

Comment on Bill Gates: CO2 = P x S x E x C by Jason

Jason — Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:22:02 +0000

The level of gullibility and susceptibility to open propaganda these days from the useful idiots is absolutely astonishing.

A quote from Bill Gate’s Ted speech,

“By 2050, the population is heading towards 9 billion people. Now if we do really well with vaccines and health care services, we can reduce that by 10-15%.”

For the useful idiots, as Lenin called them, who cannot do math and instead just devour propaganda wholesale and regurgitate it, he just openly stated that he wanted to use vaccines and “health care services” to eliminate ONE BILLION PEOPLE from Earth by 2050.

Starting to get the picture? Co2 is absolutely neccessary for all life on Earth, for without it, no plants can grow, and if no plants can grow, then humanity is dead.

Now of course, we should also discuss all the failed predictions. We were told that by 2010 sea levels would have risen dramatically, kids wouldn’t know what snow was, and that we were all doomed unless we paid our carbon taxes to international bankers, who steal land in the third world and plant some trees. Produce “carbon credits” then manipulate that trillion dollar market to loot more wealth from the planet, while pushing billions into poverty.

By the time you useful idiots get wise to the nefarious plan you’re unwittingly pushing, it will already be too late. And you will have sealed the fate of humanity.

Comment on ‘Renewables to supply 80% of the world’s energy needs by 2050′ by rogerthesurf

rogerthesurf — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:03:55 +0000

“Many technologies are already economically competitive”

Which technologies would those be then?

Cheers

Roger

http://www.rogerfromnewzealand.wordpress.com